Updated Dec.23,2005 21:55 KST

Hwang Probe Must Leave no Stone Unturned

Panel Finds Hwang Deliberately Fabricated Results
Anger, Hurt Greet Finding That Hwang Faked Research
DNA Results Take Hwang Probe to Final Stage
Hwang Associates Gave Key Witness US$30,000
Hwang Probe Close to Wrapping Up 2004 Episode
Fresh Success Claim Adds Confusion in Hwang Scandal
Vatican Pitches Into Hwang Debate
Patient-Specific Stem Cells Do Not Exist
The Dashed Hopes of Patients Are the Real Scandal
World Stem Cell Scientists Seek Strict Ethics Guidelines
SNU President Apologizes for Hwang Fraud
Hwang and Co-Authors Relieved of Duties
Hwang, Adversaries Questioned in Criminal Probe
Hwang Sacked as Probe Exonerates Team Members
Data submitted by Prof. Hwang Woo-suk with an article on the purported cloning of patient-specific stem cells to the magazine Science ¡°cannot be regarded as simple mistakes but were an intentional fabrication by means of inflating details of two stem cells into those of 11 stem cells," a Seoul National University panel disclosed on Friday.

Cardinal Stephen Kim Sou-hwan is said to have wept for several minutes after saying in a Christmas interview, ¡°This case has brought disgrace on the Korean people in the eyes of the international community.¡± The public must feel much the same, to say nothing of patients with incurable diseases, whose hearts beat faster, who sobbed when Prof. Hwang told them research had entered a new stage and only a flimsy door now separated them from a cure.

On Dec. 16, Prof. Hwang swore the source technology to make patient-specific stem cells exists, never mind that there were only a few actual stem cells. Now the data have been revealed as a fabrication; now we know that he was talking nonsense when he said his stem cells died of contamination and that cells were made even after the paper had been published. How can he now expect to get his hands on research funds? Who would now propose joint research with him, which journal would accept his papers, and what country would give him a patent?

The SNU panel should investigate a charge that as many as 1,200 ova were used up in the project, not 185 as Hwang claimed. It should check the veracity of a 2004 paper on the first cloning of embryonic stem cells and all suspicions involving the cloned cow, BSE-resistant cloned cow and cloned dog Snuppy Hwang has taken credit for. It must also discover how people who now say they made not the slightest contribution to research were listed as co-authors of the Science article, and why a junior researcher who is said to have pioneered the ¡°squeezing¡± method for removing the nucleus from human eggs received a puny monthly salary of a few hundred thousand won.

Researcher Kim Seon-jong, who was seconded to the University of Pittsburg, said in an interview with MBC¡¯s ¡°PD Dairy¡± his status was so lowly that he was in no position utter the word ¡°fabrication¡± and simply had to do what he was told. Such an authoritarian structure in the team will have created an atmosphere where fair distribution of credit was difficult and stopping abuses like the fabrications became impossible.

The Seoul National University investigation must expose such backward practices where our scientists lag far behind global standards. Only if the investigation is ruthless in its rigor will we be able to find a new base to build a future from the pile of rubble left behind by Hwang Woo-suk.


Copyright (c) 2007 The Chosun Ilbo & Digital Chosun Ilbo All rights reserved.
Contact letters@chosun.com for more information.
Privacy Statement Contact privacy@chosun.com