|
|
| Fig. 1: Hypersaline brine discharge plume from a desalination facility (Source: Wikimedia Commons). |
Water scarcity is one of the most pressing environmental and geopolitical challenges of the twenty-first century. As freshwater reserves shrink and climate variability intensifies, with 97% of Earth's water locked in saline oceans and aquifers, many coastal and arid nations have increasingly turned to seawater desalination as a secure water source. Currently, desalination is conducted via two primary methods: Reverse Osmosis (RO) and thermal distillation. RO, which is the dominant technology worldwide, uses a semipermeable membrane to separate freshwater from a saline feed under high pressure. [1] Thermal methods boil or evaporate seawater to condense freshwater. [1] Globally, desalination produces 95.37 million m3/day of potable water which accounts for 1% of global water supply, servicing approximately 300 million people worldwide. Of this outpput, 48% is is produced in the Middle East and North Africa region. [2] While this technology is highly useful and effective at extracting clean water, one fundamental challenge remains: removing freshwater concentrates the remaining salts, producing what is called brine. On average, for every liter of freshwater, approximately 1.5 liters of brine are produced. [2] Safe and environmentally conscious methods of disposing of this brine become of paramount importance as adoption of this technology continues to increase.
Despite the societal benefits of desalination, the physics of brine discharge present a complex and often unappreciated challenge. Unlike many industrial effluents, if dumped directly back into the sea, desalination brine behaves according to density stratification and negative buoyancy, where denser fluid sinks below lighter fluid and doesn't readily disperse into the surrounding environment. [3] Seawater typically has a density of approximately 1025 kg/m with a salinity of around 35 parts per thousand (ppt); however, discharged brine often exceeds 1050 kg/m due to elevated salinity ranging from 60-80 ppt or higher. [4] This density difference is described by Eq. (1), where salinity plays the dominant role. Since RO brine is typically discharged at ambient temperature, the significantly increased salinity causes its density to exceed that of the surrounding seawater. The driving force is quantified by reduced gravity g', described by Eq. (2). Since the brine density is significantly higher than the surrounding seawater, this density difference creates a negative buoyancy that drives the plume downward to the seabed. The sinking brine spreads along the sea floor. Studies have shown that these dense bottom layers can extend far from the outfall, accumulating in depressions on the seabed and forming stagnant pools of hypersaline water. [5] The consequences of such a scenario are detrimental: vertical mixing is suppressed, and thus oxygen diffusion is inhibited as the seabed becomes isolated from the water above, inducing hypoxia in benthic organisms. Additionally, hypersaline brine imposes strong osmotic pressures on marine life, effectively pulling water out of cells. [6]
Note ρ is the density, ρ0 is the reference density, S is salinity, S0 is the reference salinity, βs is the coefficient of salinity, T is temperature, T0 is the reference temperature, and α T is the coefficient of thermal expansion, g' is the reduced gravity, g is the gravitational acceleration, ρ brine is the brine density, and ρsea is the ambient seawater density.
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
Recognizing the environmental risk posed by brine discharge, researchers and industry have been developing several innovative approaches to mitigate these challenges. These solutions spans all phases of the production process. Firstly, modern desalination plants have increasingly employed sophisticated outfall designs to promote rapid dilution of brine before it reaches the seabed. Multi- port diffusers which release brine through numerous small orafices spread across the pipe as seen in Fig. 1. These jets create turbulent flow that shoots from the pipe to entrain and mix with ambient seawater. [7] This approach can achieve dilution ratios of 100:1 or higher within the initial mixing zone, substantially reducing the salinity of the discharged plume before it contacts benthic habitats. Some facilities co-locate desalination plants with power stations, blending the hypersaline brine with the power plant's cooling water discharge. This practice not only dilutes the brine but also leverages existing outfall infrastructure, though it introduces thermal pollution as an additional consideration. [8] A second system for brine management is called Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) systems which represents the most aggressive current approach to brine management by eliminating liquid waste entirely. These systems use a combination of evaporation ponds, crystallizers, and advanced thermal processes to extract water until only solid salt remains. [9] While ZLD produces commercially viable salt products and completely eliminates marine discharge, the technology is energy-intensive and economically viable primarily in arid regions with high evaporation rates or where discharge is legally prohibited. Lastly, an emerging paradigm views brine not as waste but as a resource stream containing valuable minerals and elements. Selective extraction technologies can recover lithium, magnesium, calcium, and other minerals from concentrated brine, potentially offsetting desalination costs while reducing disposal volumes. [10] Electrodialysis, ion exchange resins, and membrane crystallization enable targeted recovery of specific ions. Furthermore, research into brine mining for rare earth elements and battery materials has intensified as global demand for these resources grows, suggesting that future desalination facilities may function as integrated water-mineral production centers. [11]
Desalination stands as a vital technology for addressing global water scarcity, yet its expansion must be balanced against the environmental realities of brine disposal. The density-driven behavior of hypersaline discharge presents challenges that cannot be ignored as desalination capacity grows worldwide. However, recent innovations in discharge engineering, resource recovery, and alternative disposal methods demonstrate that these challenges are not insurmountable. By viewing brine through the dual lenses of environmental stewardship and resource opportunity, the desalination industry can evolve toward more sustainable practices. Moving forward, the integration of advanced mitigation strategies into plant design, coupled with continued research into brine valorization and ecological monitoring, will be essential to ensuring that desalination fulfills its promise as a secure water source without compromising the health of marine ecosystems. As freshwater demands intensify in the coming decades, the success of desalination technology will ultimately be measured not only by the volume of freshwater produced but by the responsibility with which its byproducts are managed.
© Larry Marshall. The author warrants that the work is the author's own and that Stanford University provided no input other than typesetting and referencing guidelines. The author grants permission to copy, distribute and display this work in unaltered form, with attribution to the author, for noncommercial purposes only. All other rights, including commercial rights, are reserved to the author.
[1] M. Elimelech and W. A. Phillip, "The Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment," Science 333, 712 (2011).
[2] E. Jones et al., "The State of Desalination and Brine Production: A Global Outlook.," Sci. Total Eviron. 657, 1343 (2019).
[3] T. Bleninger and G. H. Jirka, "Modelling and Environmentally Sound Management of Brine Discharges From Desalination Plants," Desalination 221, 585 (2008).
[4] T. M. Missimer and R. G. Maliva, "Environmental Issues in Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination: Intakes and Outfalls," Desalination 434, 198 (2018).
[5] S. Lattemann and T. Höpner, "Environmental Impact and Impact Assessment of Seawater Desalination.," Desalination 220, 1 (2008).
[6] D. A. Roberts, E. L. Johnston, and N. A. Knott, "Impacts of Desalination Plant Discharges on the Marine Environment: A Critical Review of Published Studies," Water Res 44, 5117 (2010).
[7] N. Voutchkov, "Overview of Seawater Concentrate Disposal Alternatives," Desalination 273, 205 (2011).
[8] R. R. Yamada, J. K. Laughlin, and D. K. Wood, "Co-Located Seawater Desalination/Power Facilities: Practical and Institutional Issues," Desalination 102, 279 (1995).
[9] A. Panagopoulos. K.-J. Haralambous and M. Loizidou, "Desalination Brine Disposal Methods and Treatment Technologies - A Review," Sci. Total Environ. 693, 133545 (2019).
[10] O.E. Ojo and O.A. Oludolapo, "Innovative Recovery Methods for Metals and Salts from Rejected Brine and Advanced Extraction ProcessesA Pathway to Commercial Viability and Sustainability in Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination," Water 17, 3141 (2025).
[11] E. Drioli et al., "Membrane Distillation: Recent Developments and Perspectives," Desalination 356, 56 (2015).
.jpg){kind=link}