Is Fusion Through Sonoluminescence Possible?

Mario Chapa
March 16, 2015

Submitted as coursework for PH241, Stanford University, Winter 2015


Fig. 1: Single-bubble sonoluminesce setup. The luminescing bubble is the blue dot at the center of the flask. (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Sonoluminescence is a mysterious phenomenon whereby sound is turned into heat and light inside of a bubble. A typical setup for a sonoluminescence experiment (shown in Fig. 1) consists of a small flask of water and two ultrasonic piezoelectric speakers. The speakers drive a high frequency sinusoidal signal that is tuned to the resonant frequency of the water-filled flask. This is about 25 kilohertz but will vary based on the shape and material of the flask. [1] When the pressure of the sound wave is greater than atmospheric pressure, negative pressure in the flask causes bubbles of dissolved gas such as air to form. This process is known as cavitation. As the pressure in the flask becomes positive, the bubble collapses quickly and violently and then oscillates before expanding again. [1] The process then repeats itself. As the bubble collapses, the gas inside heats up and a flash of light is emitted. Some scientists say that it heats up enough to cause nuclear fusion but others disagree.


Nuclear fusion is the process by which two light atomic nuclei (usually hydrogen) combine to form a heavier atom (helium). [2] Enormous energy can be released in the form of heat and scattered particles such as neutrons. The primary obstacle to obtaining a fusion reaction is the coulomb barrier which is the force of repulsion felt by the atoms as they get closer in distance. [2] For fusion to occur, enough energy must be supplied to the atoms to overcome this force of repulsion. This is usually done by heating up a hydrogen plasma. The average kinetic energy of the atoms increases as the temperature increases. Statistically speaking, nuclear fusion can happen at any temperature. The Maxwell-boltzmann distribution predicts a non-zero but very low probability for atoms to have a very high kinetic energy at a low temperature. However, to get a significant amount of nuclear fusion reactions to occur, the temperature must be large enough that there is statistically significant probability for atoms to have a kinetic energy above the coulomb barrier. Unfortunately, the required temperature is huge. For the easiest form of fusion (deuterium-tritium) the temperature required for sustained nuclear fusion (ignition) is about 45 million kelvin. [2] Another obstacle to achieving fusion is called the Lawson Criterion. A nuclear fusion reaction must satisfy the Lawson Criterion in order to be self-sustaining. For the criterion to be satisfied, the density of the fission reactants multiplied by how long the reaction lasts must be greater than 1014. [2]

Simplified Analysis

A simplified analysis of the bubble dynamics will be conducted under the assumptions of ideal gas and isentropic compression. I will assume that the bubble is comprised of air and that the air is only nitrogen. A good starting radius (R0) for the bubble is 5.75 micrometers. The starting temperature (T0) is 283.15 kelvin and the initial pressure (P0) is 1 atmosphere or 101,325 Pascals. The amplitude of the acoustic wave is 1.58 atmospheres and the frequency is 17 kilohertz. The Rayleigh-Plesset Equation is used to model the collapse of the bubble. [1] First, let's calculate the total energy in the bubble. The maximum energy stored in the bubble is given by E = (4/3) π Rmax3 P0. [1] The maximum radius is Rmax = 10 R0 = 57.5 micrometers. [1] The energy in the bubble is then 8.07 × 10-8 Joules. Using initial data, the number of nitrogen atoms in the bubble is 2.14 × 1010. This gives an average potential energy per atom of 23.53 eV. The average maximum collision energy is twice that which would be 47.07 eV. The required collision energy for fusion is on the order of tens of keV. From this, we can already see that it is unlikely that enough fusion reactions will occur to cause ignition assuming an isentropic collapse. Now we can turn our attention to how efficient the collapse is at turning the potential energy into kinetic energy. The minimum radius that the bubble collapses to is about 1 micrometer. [1] Using the isentropic ideal gas relations plus a correction due to the van der walls hard core, we get a maximum bubble temperature of 2678.97 Kelvin. [1] This gives an average kinetic energy of 0.346 eV per atom or 0.693 eV per collision. Thus, only 1.47% of the total average potential energy has been converted to kinetic energy. From this, we see that purely isentropic compression cannot cause the bubble to reach temperatures high enough for fusion.

Other Considerations

There is one gaping hole in the simplified analysis above. I assumed the collapse is isentropic, however, the bubble collapse reaches supersonic speeds of greater than Mach 4. [1] In the supersonic regime, a shockwave would form inside the bubble. This shockwave is non-isentropic and could potentially help to focus the energy of the collapsing bubble. A spherical shockwave could tightly compress a small amount of the gas at the very core of the bubble, possibly increasing its temperature enough to cause fusion. The resulting heat energy would diffuse throughout the bubble and, if large enough, can cause ignition throughout the bubble's volume. Shockwave analysis is a very complicated subject and will not be attempted here. Lahey Jr et al. conducted their own shockwave analysis and their result is promising. They predicted that interacting shockwaves at a point close to the core could reach about 100 million kelvin which is enough to cause deuterium-tritium fusion. However, this only lasts for about 0.1 to 1 picosecond. [3] This presents a problem because it does not satisfy the Lawson Criterion. Lahey Jr. et al. address this in their paper. For the Lawson Criterion to be satisfied for their simulation, it must last about 10000 picoseconds. Thus, while their simulation gives fusion reactions, it does not last long enough to sustain itself. They call their results "fusion sparks". [3]


Probably the main problem with sonoluminescence is the Lawson Criterion. For a portion of the bubble to heat up to fusion-level temperatures, there absolutely needs to be a very powerful shock to focus the energy because the energy gained from isentropic collapse is very negligible (as was shown in the Simplified Analysis section). For such a shock to form, the bubble must collapse extremely rapidly which naturally leads to a time scale which is much smaller than the Lawson Criterion. In the case of Lahey Jr. et al., the time scale was four to five orders of magnitude less than the Lawson Criterion. [3] One possible way to overcome this is simply to optimize the process. Have a rapid enough collapse to heat the bubble up, but have it be slow enough to meet the Lawson criterion. This, however could be impossible. Another way would be to somehow (probably using the acoustic drive signal) hold the bubble at its minimum radius long enough to satisfy the Lawson Criterion. This is also much easier said than done because sonoluminescence is very sensitive to the drive signal. Doing this may just cause unwanted instability rather than fusion ignition. Another idea could be to stimulate the bubble's contents using something other than an acoustic drive to amplify the effect of a smaller shockwave.

Another problem with sonoluminescene is that is very sensitive to the input parameters such as the gas used in the bubble, the drive signal amplitude, and initial temperature and pressure. [1] The most worrying effect is that the bubble becomes unstable above a certain acoustic drive amplitude. This is likely due to distortions in the bubble during its collapse. [1] This is problematic because the drive amplitude affects how fast the bubble collapses, its minimum radius, and ultimately the maximum temperature. Theoretically, one could just increase the amplitude and easily get temperatures hot enough for fusion if the bubble did not become unstable. One possible solution could be to experiment with different drive signals, however once again, this is a parameter that the bubble is sensitive to.

Lastly, another problem is how to extract the energy released in the bubble if ignition is achieved. I would assume that the bubble would burst, releasing all the energetic gas molecules into the surrounding water and heating the water enough to produce steam to drive a turbine. Let's take a look at the energy associated with this. Assume the same sonoluminescence situation as in the simplified analysis but with hydrogen instead of nitrogen. I will be using pure hydrogen instead of deuterium-tritium to simplify things but I will assume the energetics of a deuterium-tritium reaction. The total mass of hydrogen in the bubble is 5.57 × 10-11 grams. Since each fusion reaction takes two hydrogen atoms, that leaves 2.79 × 10-11 grams as the reactive mass. A deuterium-tritium reaction releases 331 megajoules per gram of reactive mass. [2] That means that if all the gas in the bubble undergoes sustained nuclear fusion, only 9.23 × 10-3 Joules of energy will be released. In a 100 milliliter flask typically used in sonoluminescence experiments, that's not even enough energy to raise the temperature by 1 degree Celsius! One solution is just to keep trying to cavitate more bubbles of hydrogen gas to fuse. The problem with this is that it will heat up the water gradually and sonoluminescence is sensitive to the water temperature so you may reach a maximum temperature at which bubbles no longer form. Another solution is to do multiple bubble sonoluminescence whereby multiple bubbles form and cavitate at once, however not as much fusion-level research has been done in this area.


Unfortunately, it seems fairly likely that sonoluminescence will be a dead end for nuclear fusion energy. However, there have been some promising developments that show that more research must be done. More powerful and elaborate numerical simulations, such as direct numerical simulation, can be used to probe the more complex effects of the bubble's collapse. More carefully controlled experiments and documentation and explanation of the effects of changing different parameters to control the process can also be done.

© Mario Chapa. The author grants permission to copy, distribute and display this work in unaltered form, with attribution to the author, for noncommercial purposes only. All other rights, including commercial rights, are reserved to the author.


[1] S. J. Putterman and K. R. Weninger, "Sonoluminescence: How Bubbles Turn Sound into Light, "Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 445 (2000).

[2] L. R. Radovic and H. H. Schobert. Energy and Fuels in Society (McGraw-Hill, 1992).

[3] R. T. Lahey, Jr., R. P. Taleyarkhan, and R. I. Nigmatulin, "Sonofusion - Fact or Fiction?" Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2 Oct 05.